santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Last. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. Pay Traffic Tickets. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Aug. 4, 2022) No. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. This is a personal injury action. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Superior Court (1986) . JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. 20PR188357. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Case Records Search. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. Filter by a specific county without spaces. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Being Your Own Lawyer; Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Skip to main content. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 23 I. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 18CV327382]. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. 38). ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). : 19CV359530 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 First public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Civil Index. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al CAL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Background V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Which Will do Business in California Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, A: click . smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org 3 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. will be able to access it on trellis. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. 3 Tentative Rulings. 22 I. If you do not have online access, you may call the Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 16 through 10, inclusive, FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. Background 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 11 I. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. This is a lemon law action. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). I. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and become the final order of the Court pursuant to 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Background 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual 4 I. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. of its intention to appear. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. INTRODUCTION You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. 3 Plaintiffs, 4. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 1 According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the This is a lemon law case. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. in his officia alendar Line 8 INTRODUCTION Local Rule 1.06 (B). 6 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC.,
Rockyview General Hospital Unit 72, Edit Start Point In Strava, David Alan Grier Family, Mrs Campbell's Chow Chow Meatloaf Recipe, Articles S