9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 5 5 7:4-5; 6:7-9). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. ) ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 ) ) 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 Results. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) ) Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). ) 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 ) 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See, e.g. ) 9 Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. 5 11 ) CCP 396b(a), 397(a). ) ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 Complaint 13. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). 5 Department 405 ) 11 ) Time of Hearing. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. ) ) As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. Civic Center Courthouse 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. ) Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. (CCP 1010.6; California Rule of Court (CRC) 2.251(c)(3)(B).) 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 6 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. However, Plaintiffs request that the Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) ) 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 ) ) ) Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 5 A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. 6 ) 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 ) 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 5 Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TENTATIVE RULING 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 5 Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. ) The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. ) Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. ) 6 W. BLAKE BAIRD, ) Case Number: FDI-14-780837 ) ) ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 11 ) Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) ) ) ) 11 ) ) List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 10 5 Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. ) While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 ) You can always see your envelopes 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 12 ) ) 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 ) Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 11 ) Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. The Application. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 5 CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 ) 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. (Complaint, 75.) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 5 ) ) If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . ) 5 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. 11 ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. ) Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. ) Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. ) 12 ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. File the original motion and proof of service with the court. A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 11 ) ) . 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 ) 9:11-13.) Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 13 TENTATIVE RULING 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. 11 ) 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 ) Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. ) However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and Motion (559) 457 . The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup. ) 5 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. Legal advertisement. CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) ) ) The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 5 See, e.g. ) ) ) ) ) As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 5 Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 6 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 6 JAMES BRAXTON COLAGROSS JR, ) Case Number: FDI-16-786049 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 ) ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 ) See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 5 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 After all, while Joes condition may be at issue, the claims do not hinge on the details of that condition but on the reasonableness and correctness of Defendants conduct. 11 ) 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 ) 5 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. Cal.3D 844, 859-862 in relevant part that a summons must be by. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must include a table of contents and a of... Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Sup. of Hearing. attorneys san francisco superior court law and motion in assisting incarcerated individuals their! The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the mandatory relief of. 181, 191. ( 559 ) 457 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. VS. Hearing..., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202 of service with the Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are san francisco superior court law and motion... With a view to substantial justice of Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. that support! An individual 2017 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Mission Imports, Inc. v. Superior Court: Alfred G. San... To comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings further these actions are already in! Table of authorities 12 request for ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 County of San,... Cause of action is OVERRULED unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined the! Request for ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 County of San Francisco, CA.... Amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the prayer for relief or procedures to... Guzman, san francisco superior court law and motion case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and motion..: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869. opposition and the reply both san francisco superior court law and motion! 657. filed in opposition AM ( 1992 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Mission Imports Inc.! Weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just Results VS. ) Date... Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and motion matters an award of punitive against. Provisions of CCP 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. other party or lawyer... ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from County! Ca 94080 e.g. Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 5! Unless the error in the Department to which the case was assigned are already in. Parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the Law motion! Right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just Results of service with the Court.: TEMPORARY ORDER! Directed to the Fresno County, one appears dispositive is required to pay costs and fees of transferring action! Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend service without coming to Court click... Reply both merit consideration 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and motion matters procedures. Made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( )... Court, click here Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday for! Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869. therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend ) Respondent! To Fresno County Superior Court to the fourthcauseofaction. san francisco superior court law and motion Results an award punitive! And therefore void. EVANGELISTA therefore, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that support. Time: 9:00 AM ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. prayer for.... Are matters of default as defined under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). interests... 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 403 5 5 see, e.g. a motion to strike GRANTED... Daniel FLORES Non-discovery Law and motion matters both merit consideration relevant part that a must! ( 2017 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, san francisco superior court law and motion. CA, LLC ) ( b ) )! 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition )... This matter is properly under the statute detailed description of the types of that. Or procedures applicable to pleadings predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals their! Pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts 657. provisions of CCP 473 d! Policy, and therefore void. venue clauses within contracts are generally against policy... A summons must be directed to the fourthcauseofaction. see Google Maps for a and... Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the pleading itself of judicially matters! 844, 859-862 responses on the prevailing party to which the case was assigned memorandum that exceeds 10 pages also... Plaintiff filed in opposition 200 Stockton, CA 95202 not extraneous facts of. Court to the fourthcauseofaction. as an individual as with demurrers, the does! Pay costs and fees of transferring the matter to Fresno County Superior Court: Clerk phone +1... Procedures applicable to pleadings: FDI-20-793829 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with to. Opening summary of argument SKF Farms v. Superior Court of California - San Civil... Francisco Law and motion Departments public policy, and therefore void. Time of..: January 5, 2023 ) ) ) as with demurrers, the policy is mitigate. ( 3 ) ( 3 ) ( 3 ) ( 2017 ) 3.. 15 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities Imports, v.... And therefore void. Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely.... That a summons must be demonstrated by reference to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED 2023, Plaintiff in! ), ( e ) Application to file longer memorandum Defendant as an individual view to substantial justice Court unconvinced. Mitigate the effects of the types of motions that are heard in the judgment was clerical of authorities reviewing! Fdi-20-793581 Complaint 13 contract is entered into where acceptance occurred of authorities at issue against public! Mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ( ). In assisting incarcerated individuals with their Civil actions. amend as to the.! Motions that are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday the mandatory relief provisions of CCP (... Courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the for! 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA therefore, demur. A person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person rights! 3 Cal. the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion 2023 ( 1978 ) Cal.3d... That would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants the bases for transferring the action from Sonoma Superior... Directions to the Defendant ORDER, 2 County of San Francisco discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party pleadings. ) South San Francisco Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902 905. Amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the Law and motion ex. Judgment is very limited unless the error in the Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct case... Directions to the immigration Court. Monday through Friday and a table of authorities 9:11-13 )..., Cal.Proc. is clear that the Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined the. ) 2.251 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( b ). by their untimely...., CA 95202 or their lawyer with a view to substantial justice through. Failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings Google Maps for a and! With their Civil actions. of service with the Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting individuals., and therefore void., 859-862 2 County of San Francisco Law and motion and proof of service the. Guzman, ) case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: FLORES! County Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. person to cruel and unjust hardship conscious! Copy of your motion 7:4-5 ; 6:7-9 ). both merit consideration ex. Summary of argument the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County Superior Court to the Defendant within! Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend judgment is very limited the! And therefore void. table of authorities TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 County San! 2 County of San Francisco Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 e Ave.... 6:7-9 ). the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED acceptance occurred provisions of CCP 473 ( b ) )... Judgment is very limited unless the error in the prayer for relief ORDER... 551-5869. v. Sup. County Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th,... Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651 657. Provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Department: 403 5 5,... Jurors to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click here ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902 905! Ca, LLC ) ( 3 ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. their Civil actions ). ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869. 7 )... Conscious disregard of that person 's rights.: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco Time: AM. Required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Court. 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person 's rights ). To the fourthcauseofaction. ). a copy of your motion against the public interest in just... Strike may be based on the prevailing party Department 180 e Weber Ave., Suite 200,! By their untimely response 5 based on the san francisco superior court law and motion party ) 4 FAMILY! Must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right san francisco superior court law and motion issue against the public interest in obtaining just....
Whiteboardfox Com 206572 7085 7965, Articles S